Human Resources Code of Ethics Essay Example for Free

Human Resources Code of Ethics EssayMessageI am thrilled to get in touch Company Xs management team up. My colleagues keep back been stellar in providing me support and helping me accilmate to the organisational culture, which is diverse from what I am accustomed to.I get to encountered my first ch anyenge, a ch wholeenge that is incumbent that I bring to your attention along with three detailed answers, inclusive of attractive and detractive aspects of each. It is as well as important that I share with you the methodology I employed to arrive at these conclusions, since it is discernmentable for you to have access to and sieve the methodology employed to engender these solutions. I forget as well as recommend to you an bewitch course of action.Separately, I provide present a report, which will report the findings of an digest that I conducted on our companys good decision-making border. This report will include strategies to mitigate against concerns I will have raised in the memorandum. I will also discuss the serve of creating a code of morals that will provide for employee growth through and through ethical decision making and continued company gross growth. growthion ConcernCompany X is the masterminder in the crossingion of scam whistlings for children the world over. Our wind production plant is located within the United States and, naturally, is under the purview of production guidelines set forrad by the U.S. government.The quality-assurance department recently informed me of a production issue that has arisen. Toy whistles that have been fabricate and are on schedule for shipment undergo an arduous testing outgrowth to ensure that the composition of each toy meets federal regulations. Toy whistles that will be shipped to South American countries have, unfortunately, failed lead-level requirements they are moderately higher in lead than what is legally tolerable. Our company has decisions to make about how we address thi s considerable concern. later on analysis, collaboration with team members, and sufficient reflection, I have developed three solutions to address this concern. Each solution has attractive and detractive aspects, both of which I will discuss. Ethical, legal, and financial considerations must be made with all solutions. tooth root 1 Cease shipment Re-produce Toy WhistlesAt watercourse lead levels, the toy whistle would not be shipped to clients. The entire production process would re-apply, which includes re-securing the raw materials necessary to make replacement whistles, re-producing those whistles through the production process, and commissioning the quality-assurance department to verify that the whistles meet all federal guidelines for selling and consumption. It will also be important that the quality-assurance department provide a quality verification of its own processes. Such a verification will be necessary, since antecedent quality processes failed to identify the high er-than-normal lead levels of our toy whistles.Solution 1 Explanation of Method Used to Select SolutionA combination of brainstorming and SWOT analysis were employed to determine three solutions for our companys quandary. The brainstorming process involved three team members who reviewed the situation and offered ideasany ideasas solutions. Each team member produced two ideas, totaling six possible solutions. The side by side(p) is a breakdown of submissions by team membersBob Jones Celine Jiles Patti DurantStop labor Adjust Lead Levels pertain production Bribe Foreign and home(prenominal)ated help Government Stop Production Offer Different Product Stop Production Make Plastic Whistles Continue Production Ignore Lead Levels Stop Production Close BusinessA SWOT analysis was performed on each decision alternative to test its integrity. SWOT is an acronym for Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats (Bradford, Duncan, Tarcy, 2000). The goal is to reduce the possible res ponses to those that require attention.Bob Jones Solution AStrengths Legal and ethical approach to doing business. Promotes high levels of customer service. Holds all parties accountable for their actions due to process review and refinement.Weaknesses Delayed production. brusque customer- comfort surveys in the short term. Costly to hold up production.Opportunities Favorable contract renegotiation if determined process visitation with supplier. Possible acquisition of wise customers if mitigative steps made known.Threats Possible government intervention if lead levels are exposed. Possible customer revolt if mitigative steps to lead levels not perceived correctly. node churnpossibly to rivalrydue to production grip. Board of directors overhaul of C-level managementBased on these considerations, Solution A is a viable candidate for resolution.Bob Jones Solution BStrengths No delay in production. Customer satisfaction not harmed. Foreign government receptive to bribes. No dis ruption to gross.Weaknesses Domestic government not receptive to bribing. Massive cost due to bribing. No consideration for customer health. short-term solution. Socially irresponsible course of action.Opportunities Short-term customer growth. Relationship-building with external government.Threats Considerable legal actions from both domestic and foreign government if not receptive bribes. Possible legal threats from customers.The costs associated with Solution A betoken that it is not a viable solution.Celine Jiles Solution AStrengths Legal and ethical approach to doing business. Promotes high levels of customer service due to considering customers health. Holds all parties accountable for their actions due to process review and refinement.Weaknesses Massive delays in production. revocation of contract with current supplier. Extensive training costs for new products. Extensive project-management costs to deploy new product. Substantial improver in customer churn due to offering different product. Possible negative press in foreign market. Possible domestic layoffs due to change in product.Opportunities New streams of revenue due to new product. New streams of customers due to new-product demand. New, lower cost contracts with new suppliers. Possible employment of foreign workers to replace costly domestic workers.Threats Legal threats from current employees subject layoff. Possible customer revolt if competitor unable to make up for our departure from whistle market. Increased regulatory scrutiny possible base on new product. Intractable board of directors.Based on these considerations, Solution A is a viable candidate for resolution.Celine Jiles Solution BStrengths Minimal delay in production. Avoid lead-level requirements. Safter products for customers, on that pointby increasing customer satisfaction. Avoid legal issues from foreign and domestic governments. Contract abrogation with supplier if process failure due to supplier. Socially responsible c ourse of action.Weaknesses Contract abrogation with existing supplier if Company X process failure. Short-term customer dissatisfaction due to minimal production delay. Training for production of new whistles. Costly process refinements.Opportunities Possible acquisition of new customers. Long-term customer growth. Possibly reduced prices with contract negotiations for new suppliers. If process adjustments made public, possible acquisition of customers in other countries.Threats Minimal threat of legal action from domestic or foreign governments due to initlal lead-level failures. Minimal threat of substantial customer churn.The strengths of Solution B picture that is viable enough to be considered. Patti Durant Solution AStrengths Reduced production costs. Short-term customer satisfaction due to on-time delivery. Possible increased customer acquisition.Weaknesses Very short-term solution. give notice for long-term customer health. Disregard for domestic legal mandates. Socially i rreponsible course of action. Long-term profit loss. High customer churn in long term.Opportunities Short-term increase in streams of revenue.Threats Extensive legal threats from public and private sector. Abrogation of current contracts iminent. Long-term erosion of shareholder confidence.Solution A should not be and considered due to the blantant make out for customer safety.Patti Durant Solution BStrengths Regard for customer health.Weaknesses Total loss of all revenue and profit.Opportunities No known opportunities.Threats Possible legal action from suppliers, employees, customers, and governments due to abrogation of contracts, inability to pay out on employee pensions, or willfully missed customer demand.Solution B is unquestionably not worthy of further consideration.Solution 1 Advantages and DisadvantagesThe important advantage this solution offers is that our toy whistles lead levels will not detrimentally influence the health of our customers. Our identification of this issue will allow our company to take mitigative actions in advance the whistles are in the hands of our consumers.another(prenominal) advantage of this solution is that our customers will be unaware that there could have been an issue with the whistles. Our consumers ignorance allows our company to avoid a public-relations concern or public excoriation of our product and company brand. There are no government mandates that our company must disclose these sorts of issues if they are observe before being delivered to our customers.An important disadvantage to this solution is that the investigative process and issueant process refinements will prove costly and timely. It is evident that a production and service failure has occurred, since our whistles lead levels currently contradict United States legislative mandates however, we are not certain where in the supply chain this failure has occurred. inessential people-power must be devoted to resolving this issue sufficiently to p revent issues in the similitude of this one.Another disadvantage to this solution is the effect it will have on employee morale. To be specific, the judgment of the managers of these processes is dubious and will have to be investigated. It is unquestionable that coaching and development, inclusive of corrective action, will have to be meted to all parties involved in this situation. And because of the cost of resolving this matter, some managers and their employees may have to have their employment alter. No matter how delicately the corrective action will be handled, other employees will inevitable resolve negatively. This situation may encourage discussions of unionization. It may engender unnecessary employee churn. Or for those who have their employment terminated as a result of our investigation, it may very well involve contending against ex-employee litigation for perceived illegitimate termination, which will involve government agencies and their investigations.Solution 1 Ethical ConsiderationsThis solution is an ethically viable option. The reason is that the lead levels prescribed by the federal government are ostensibly predicated on customer saftey and, if to a greater extent stringent, supersede lead-level requirements of the target country. Providing customers, especially young children, with high-lead toys is immediately unethical and demonstrates a disconnection from social responsibility.Solution 1 Financial ConsiderationsThis solution, however, is the most costly and will make profit from these sales impossible unless we increase the price of the toy whistles. Thefollowing are cost considerations of this solution1. Vetting Raw-Material Supplier It is possible that the raw materials that we secure from our supplier do not possess the integrity that we expect, which would cause products to fail quality verfifcations. An audit would be required of the supplier. This audit would entail the following costs a. On-site inspections $10,000, incl usive of labor costs and go expenditures b. Report of findings $5,000, inclusive of labor costs of presenting the findings c. Negative findings $10,000, inclusive of replacing and contracting with a different raw-materials supplier. d. Positive findings $15,000, inclusive of sunk costs of on-site inspections and reporting of findings (since no issue would have been with the supplier)2. Vetting Production Processes There may be deficiencies in the production process that cause higher levels of lead to result in our products. Here are the costs associated with this vetting e. Departmental inspections $7,000, inclusive of labor costs f. Report of findings $5,000, inclusive of labor costs of presenting the findings g. Negative findings $50,000, inclusive of making process adjustments, training on new processes, and critique labor costs h. Positive findings $12,000, inclusive of sunk costs of inspections and reporting of findings.As easily noted, the costs of making process changes are considerable. However, the costs of these changes should not, by themselves, be an impetus to continue to produce high-lead toy whistles.